• home
  • about
  • books
  • links

Posts Tagged ‘church’

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

Foundations In Community – Part 2

Monday, March 12th, 2012

Previous Post – Your Will Be Done – A Prayer

In “Foundations In Community – Part 1″, I proposed the first two foundational convictions that we are exploring at Little Flowers Community.  They are:

“Every member of this community is an important part of the whole that reflects Christ.  Our ability to live & thrive as Christ followers is dependent on one another.  Thus, we must VOLUNTARILY make the common good of the community our priority.  Only in this way can our individual well-being truly be protected.”

“For our community there can be only one ultimate authority- our loving God, whose will we discern together as a community by His Holy Spirit”

Building on those two convictions, we will continue to explore and building upon more.

________________________________

There are times and places where a good, high percentage reflects well on a subject and other times and places where it does not.  For example, if someone offered you a way to quit smoking that was proven 95% effective, that would likely be impressive enough to get your attention and possibly your respect.  On the other hand, if you were sending you kid to summer camp for a week and the brochure boasted a 99.5% survival rate for the kids, I doubt you’d be packing their bags.

Perhaps the most significant example where anything other than 100% would not suffice is with respect to being faithful to ones spouse.  I am not saying that, through forgiveness and grace, a couple cannot find reconciliation when experiencing infidelity, but rather that no matter how long I might be faithful to my wife, it only takes one failure to crush her heart.  In fact, the longer one is faithful, the more devastating that infidelity can be.  True faithfulness is an all or nothing proposition.

In Matthew 6:24, Jesus said:

“No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.”

While Jesus was referring to money, the truth remains true across the board: any desire, relationship, commitment, etc. that demands shared fidelity with Christ is unacceptable.  This is not to say that my marriage divides my loyalty, as marriage is one context in which we can express faithfulness to Christ.  Rather, it is about a submission to anything that leads us to compromise, even in small degrees, our commitment to live in the way of Jesus.  Jesus will not share us with other masters, at all.

And yet, in beautiful, paradoxical contrast, Jesus responds to us sinners with grace, forgiveness and love, time and again.  Few examples more powerfully illustrate this than Jesus’ encounter with the woman caught in adultery.  Only at the very end of their exchange, does Jesus address her behaviour. He knows that her behaviour is more likely to be transformed by his loving defense and embrace (which put him at very real risk) than through fear of the judgment, legitimate as it might have been.  So how do we reconcile this paradox?

The call of Christ to unwavering and absolute faithfulness stems from the same sources as His radical grace and forgiveness: they are borne out of His love.

It is, of course, critical that we never abuse this love by taking advantage of His grace (Romans 6), but it is equally critical that we do not use the call to faithfulness as a tool of exclusion and judgment on others.  How we live and serve Christ must reflect the same central source of the paradox above: we are to love God and others.

Therefore, I want to propose the third foundational conviction:

“The only requirement to be welcomed as a member of our church community is the desire and commitment to follow Jesus.”

In other words, we are committed to welcome and include anyone into our community who recognizes their own brokenness and who desire to find wholeness in Christ.  We are committed to welcome people regardless of what (if anything) they have to offer us, nor do we require conformity in every detail of belief and practice.  Rather, what is required is a commitment to the exclusive Lordship of Jesus and a commitment to His Body, especially in this local expression.

Let me be clear: this is not what we require of people who join us in worship or share life with us day to day.  Rather, this is a commitment for those of us who identity Little Flowers Community as our primary faith community, voluntarily submitting to this demanding, yet liberating way of life together.

Building on that, I would propose the fourth foundational conviction (insinuated earlier):

“The primary place the discern God’s will is in the context of the Christ-committed community.”

Many of us grew up in good, Christian contexts where, when a person became a Christian, the bulk of their spiritual journey was complete.  Yes, they focused on morality and devotional disciplines, with a strong emphasis on ushering others into that culmination of faith that is salvation, but there was little beyond that except the expectation of heaven.  Yet we believe that salvation is to faith what a wedding is to marriage- a significant and beautiful inauguration, not culmination, of something new.  It is only when we enter into the Body of Christ that we are truly able to begin and discern His will for our lives.

This fourth foundational conviction is built on the truth that our local church is a small expression of the Body of Christ, while still a part of the wider, catholic Church.  We relate and seek counsel from the wider community of communities that is the Church, but we take primary responsibility to discern God’s will for us.  Yes, this primarily means His will for us as a community, but it also means we recognize the need to trust our community to speak into (not control) our personal choices as well.

The process of this discernment is more complex than this space allows for, but it includes prayer, study, discussion, debate, experimenting and, again, prayer.  We seek to do things through consensus as much as possible.  As idealistic as it may sound, in truth it is a very hard, slow and often inefficient process.  Yet it helps us resist both the impulse to control and the impulse to be controlled, requiring all to own and invest in the work of God in our community.  This is still a process we are wrestling with on a daily basis.

Let me sum up the four foundational convictions I have proposed so far:

1. “Every member of this community is an important part of the whole that reflects Christ.  Our ability to live & thrive as Christ followers is dependent on one another.  Thus, we must VOLUNTARILY make the common good of the community our priority.  Only in this way can our individual well-being truly be protected.”

2. “For our community there can be only one ultimate authority- our loving God, whose will we discern together as a community by His Holy Spirit”

3. “The only requirement to be welcomed as a member of our church community is the desire and commitment to follow Jesus.”

4. “The primary place the discern God’s will is in the context of the Christ-committed community.”

Next week we will be focusing on a singular conviction that explores the missional implications of Christ communities.

Tags: church, Community, Missional
Posted in Community, Leadership, Missional, church | 1 Comment »

Following The Leader Where Ever She May Go

Saturday, February 4th, 2012

Previous Post – The Disciples Prayer

Last Tuesday, at the annual Desiring God pastors conference, well-known pastor & author John Piper advocated for what he calls a “masculine Christianity,” claiming that “God has given Christianity a masculine feel.”

“God revealed Himself in the Bible pervasively as king not queen; father not mother,” Piper said. “The second person of the Trinity is revealed as the eternal Son not daughter; the Father and the Son create man and woman in His image and give them the name man, the name of the male…God appoints all the priests in the Old Testament to be men; the Son of God came into the world to be a man; He chose 12 men to be His apostles; the apostles appointed that the overseers of the Church be men; and when it came to marriage they taught that the husband should be the head.”

“Now, from all of that I conclude that God has given Christianity a masculine feel,” said Piper. “And being God, a God of love, He has done that for our maximum flourishing both male and female… He does not intend for women to languish or be frustrated or in any way suffer or fall short of full and lasting joy in this masculine Christianity. From which I infer that the fullest flourishing of women and men takes place in churches and families that have this masculine feel.”

More of his comments can be found here.

Generally, my online response to such controversies are to remain silent- not because I do not believe that such dangerous theology should not be confronted, but rather because, in the age of viral-videos and social media, I resist giving more air time to what I believe is ignorant, dangerous, damaging, etc.

However, when Rachel Held Evans called upon Christian men to respond, I felt compelled to break that rule.  Rachel’s challenge was as follows:

“There’s a double-standard out there in which a woman’s critique of patriarchy tends to get discounted as nothing more than the rants of an “angry feminist,” and, truth be told, I’ve grown a bit weary of hearing that charge each time I speak out about this disturbing trend in the evangelical church.

So instead, I’d like to challenge the guys to respond.”

Rachel is a writer whose passion and poignancy continues to challenge me to grow in faith and truth.  Without a question, she is a leader in the Body of Christ who I need to follow.  Her ability bring life to God’s truth- yes, that means she teaches from Scripture- and communicate it effectively and engagingly in our current culture and context is a gift to Christian everywhere.  And so, I felt her invitation deserved a response.

Since volumes have been written about what God (and His written Word) has to say about gender, I will not attempt to explain the details of what I believe and how I arrived there.  Rather, let me sum it up by saying that I am deeply convinced that God calls both women and men into all vocations in the Church, gifting and empowering them to walk with one another in obedience to those callings.  Therefore, I believe women are called to pastor churches, to teach Christians of all ages and gender.  I have seen such women walk in that obedience and have been blessed to submit to their authority, including and especially my wife, Kim.

Further, I believe that in a marriage relationship between a man and a woman, they are to work together in mutual submission, respecting the differences in their giftings and experience- difference that are apparent in the unique individual, not based on their gender.  There have been many times in which I have rightfully submitted to the authority of my wife.  At times it was because she was clearly more knowledgeable, gifted and/or experienced in the situation at hand or because we believe that the Spirit was leading her.  In faith, we work through our differences and, when necessary, submit to the other as we see appropriate.  It is not always easy nor efficient, but it seems to me that following Christ rarely is.

As I read the story of God through Scripture and study the move of God through the rest of history, I am deeply convinced that the patriarchy that is so prevalent is a reflection of the brokenness of sin which has been and is being reversed by the redemptive work of Christ.  That reversal is the work of the Spirit, breaking into the world and making God’s impossible kingdom a reality.  This is the work of God, the work of Christ and thus, the work of His Body.

We are called to be the living alternative to the broken reality of what we see in the world around us.  Failure to do so is to walk in rebellion against the only Saviour worthy of our devotion and the only King worthy of our obedience.  There is no more or even possibility for neutrality on this issue.  As Desmond Tutu once said:

“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.”

Worse than silence or supposed neutrality is identify the brokenness of sin in our lives and call it sacred.  It is seems almost tantamount to apostasy to celebrate as God’s intention the devastating consequences of our sin.

While unpopular to say so, I believe that Piper (and those like him) affirm these flawed beliefs out of the best intentions.  They are seeking to be faithful to what they believe is God’s design for His people- for all people.  This truth does not excuse them of the resulting sin- and yes, I believe it must be called sin- however, it should give us pause in how we respond to such failings.

Public and prophetic rebuke is often necessary in such cases.  However, there are few who seem to be able to make such corrections with the grace necessary to still reflect the God waiting to forgive their (and our) sins (and I believe Rachel is one of those few). Instead, the primary response by Christians should be one of humility, grace and unparalleled devotion to live the better alternative, at any cost.

Every generation looks back upon the Church before us and finds their failings and blind spots obvious and hard to comprehend.  Yet, like them, we are equally blind to our own failings.  The realization that our grandchildren will shake their heads at some of our failings should nurture in us a patient grace.  While it might be gratifying to “crucify” (and I do not use that word by accident) those we rightly rebuke, most are being as faithful in their flawed beliefs as we are in our own.  Yes, we need to be strong, clear and uncompromising in our correction, but love and grace must win.

As a Christian man, I am committed to submitting to Christ by submitting to the women He has called, gifted and commanded to lead His Church.  While I am grateful and humbled to do so, it should not be credited to me as meritorious in any way.  While such a commitment might be exceptional with respect to past and current realities, our measure is Christ and His kingdom.  To do any less is unacceptable.

Tags: church, gender, Leadership, women
Posted in Bible, Justice, Leadership, Missional, Pastors, church | 22 Comments »

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »
  • The cost of being a whole person: http://t.co/DjQcuqb6 #quote #books #christianity # 2012/05/19
    Follow Me

    • Adoption (15)
    • Advent (5)
    • Anabaptism (31)
    • Bible (38)
    • Books (76)
    • church (62)
    • Church Planting (34)
    • Community (170)
    • Discipleship (36)
    • Easter (1)
    • emerging church (4)
    • Evangelism (19)
    • Film (12)
    • Gospel (57)
    • Jesus (43)
    • Justice (84)
    • Leadership (27)
    • Missional (277)
    • Money (8)
    • Pastors (13)
    • Peace (17)
    • Personal (15)
    • prayer (10)
    • Preaching (1)
    • Sexuality (7)
    • St. Francis (37)
    • Third Place (6)
    • Uncategorized (247)
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
    • 2008
    • 2007

Jamie Arpin-Ricci – Blog is proudly powered by WordPress
Site Design by SoloDesign.ca
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).