.
Previous Post – The Book of James – Part 4
This morning I read Neil Cole’s post “Defending Organic Church – Part 1″ (via David Fitch), in which we responds to concerns about the need for more leadership in organic churches. Neil offers three cautions in response to this need:
1. Recruiting mature leaders is a consumerist response to the problem, rather than growing leaders from within the community.
2. Evaluating maturity based on “check-lists” of knowledge is unhelpful. Rather we must patiently allow people to mature through process & time.
3. Depending on the church to produce leaders won’t work. Jesus will bring His Church into being through the maturity of the community.
While I understand and affirm these points as generalities, I worry that this article fails to acknowledge the grassroots complexity of these issues. Perhaps I am responding in defensiveness, since we are considering things he expressly discourages, but I don’t think so. Rather, it is the unqualified simplicity of the answers that concern me. I acknowledge that this is only Part 1, with more to come, so let me note that I am not attempting to refute Cole here, but only add some perspective.
I believe that, as much as possible, we need to seek to develop and disciple communities out of which the share leadership of the church can emerge. However, this should preclude bringing in mature leadership. In our community- an inner city house church- the very work of discipleship and leadership formation (combined with the complex pastoral issue common to the inner city, such as mental illness, addiction, etc.) is such that it we need greater stability and diversity of gifting in our current leadership. While we strongly champion (and practice) releasing leadership from within the community, we have also learned that it can be unfair and irresponsible to push people too quickly into certain responsibilities. Further, as the welcome and love of the community continues to draw in more and more people (most with high needs), the leadership vacuum is significant.
At one point, Cole says “To try and coral that energy and consume it with Bible study lessons by older Christians who are far removed from a changed life is to lose all the inertia of a movement. We need mentors who will release and empower rather than hold people back and create dependency.” On one hand, I can completely affirm this value. On the other, I am frustrated by the assumption that mature leadership from outside the community is caricatured so unfairly. The criticism here is not with recruiting mature leadership, but the nature of the leadership recruited. As we look for mature leadership to work with us, we hold a very high and hard standard, which includes meaningfully entering into the community, both geographically and relationally. So perhaps I am missing something in respect to how Cole defines “recruitment” or even “mature leadership”.
Scripture gives us many example of mature leaders being called from and sent to other communities, often to help serve the needs of maturing, but struggling churches. While we must resist the influence colonialism has had on this approach, we should not reject it entirely. Further, in communities such as the inner city, intentional diversification of the community (in such areas of age, socio-economics, etc.) is critical (and wonderful) wherever possible. Bringing in mature leadership, done responsibly, can be one way to do this.
More could be said on this point (and the other two points), but let me stop there for now. Again, I am not rejecting or even disagreeing with Cole on these points, only expressing concern that they reflect an unqualified and, perhaps in place, an unfair over-simplification. While we cannot expect him to speak to every context, this qualification is necessary. Well intentioned communities could easily burn themselves out in pursuing this ideal rather than seeking the appropriate and necessary help elsewhere. I know that our community could not survive without a more nuanced and careful engagement of the leadership question addressed here.
What do you think?


