• home
  • about
  • books
  • links

Archive for December, 2011

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

What Is The Church? Disciples Break Bread

Sunday, December 11th, 2011

Previous Post – What Is The Church? Discernment & Discipline

In the previous post we explored what it meant to be a community of discernment and discipline, positing an alternative community and leadership structure over and against the more coercive power structures of hierarchical systems.  Further, we saw that it produces communities of humility and confession that represent a missional witness to a watching world.  In this next post, we will engage what it means to participate in Eucharist (or Communion or the Lord’s Supper).  Yoder calls this practice as the disciples breaking bread together.

As a child, when we sat in church during a communion service, I would hear Jesus’s words to “do this in remembrance of me”.  While I knew that He said this while sitting at a table (albeit, all of them sitting crowded on one side), I presumed that He leading His disciples in the familiar practice that was happening in front of me.  In time, I learned that centuries of ritual, conflict, culture and tradition stood between my communion experience and the table where Jesus broke break with His disciples.

The change started when I began to understand the Passover feast (which we do not have the time to explore here).  What stood out to me about this practice (along with many other Jewish traditions) was that this deeply sacred meal was integrated into the context of life and home, not set apart as a ritual largely set apart from life.  The need to “sacramentalize” the so-called mundane aspects of life became very clear.  However, even then, because of how Jesus’s followers went on to engage in this practice, it was clear that Jesus was not simply calling us to remember Him during Passover (which is only an annual event).

Instead, Jesus was calling His followers to remember Him when we came together as His people to share a meal together.  Yoder wrote in an essay:

“Our history of centuries of speculation and controversy about what happens to bread and wine when a certain special person speaks certain special Latin words over them obscured from our memory for a long time the fact that the primary  meaning of the Eucharistic gathering in the Gospel and Acts is economic. It was the fulfillment of the promise of the Magnificat that the rich would give up their advantages and the poor would be well fed. Luke’s report probably is intended to signal the fulfillment of the mandate of Deuteronomy that “there should be no poor among you.”

In our western culture, food (and meals) are far less significant, often nothing more than entertainment.  Thus, the idea of pulling Communion out of the ritual of the church worship context and incorporating it into a common meal would seem to diminish its sacredness.  Instead, we are called to rediscover and reinvest the sacred into the shared meal.  In fact, the way church gathers should arguably reorganize around this central act of worship, where hospitality return as an essential practice of the faith.

At Little Flowers Community, the shared meal is the central act of worship in our church.  Each brings what they can for a very eclectic collection of food that we share freely with one another.  Rich, poor, mentally ill or social awkward- all of us come together in the round, explicitly for our shared love for and devotion to Jesus, and celebrate Him through “feasting”.

However, the intimacy, celebration and unity that is displayed in that shared meal is a deeply attractive experience.  As people outside of the church meet us, see that intimacy, participate in our common meal, they taste and see the goodness of God.  They are not drawn by the piety of the group, but rather by the genuine love and community.  Communion, then, becomes a beautiful invitation (and opportunity) for people to begin to enter into the redemptive work of Christ.

And what better way to demonstrate the fullness of the redemptive work than Communion?  As we remember Christ’s sacrifice, we celebrate the hope of reconciliation with God.  Further, as the means of that reconciliation is to die to self and to be resurrected together as His Body, it also opens the door for genuine relationship with one another.  In this love of God and others, we can truly discover the fullness of life as individuals, uniquely known and love by God and others.  Even the redemption of creation is celebrated as the bread and wine- substance of the earth itself- is the medium by which we enact this work of restoration.

For many, participating in Communion is a private piety between the individual and God.  Has that been your experience?  Has that changed?  If so why?

What does Communion mean to you and your community?

Tags: church, Communion, Community, Missional
Posted in Community, Gospel, Jesus, church | 10 Comments »

What Is The Church? Discernment & Discipline

Friday, December 9th, 2011

Previous Post – What Is The Church? Exploring Body Politics

The terms “discernment” and “discipline” can seem daunting- especially the latter of the two.  However, I believe that these challenges are not largely due to the nature of these practices themselves, but due to the way they are used within Christian contexts that utilize systems of coercion and authoritarianism typical of Christendom expressions.  Therefore, if we can try to somewhat extricate ourselves from those dynamics, what would these dynamic disciplines look like?

Yoder brings these two together through use of Matthew 18:15-20, which reads:

“If your brother or sister sins, go and point out their fault, just between the two of you. If they listen to you, you have won them over. But if they will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’ If they still refuse to listen, tell it to the church; and if they refuse to listen even to the church, treat them as you would a pagan or a tax collector.

“Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.

“Again, truly I tell you that if two of you on earth agree about anything they ask for, it will be done for them by my Father in heaven. For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them.”

In this text we see the connection between correction within the Body of Christ and practice of community discernment, namely that the community is called to discern together the will and way of following Christ, even (and perhaps especially) with respect to sin in the community.

First, we must recognize that the primary posture of correction in this text is one of resolution, restoration and reconciliation.  While this might seem an obvious emphasis, in practice the church all too commonly allows punitive values to become primary in the purpose and process of discipline.  While punishment is valid and often necessary, even it should be practiced with the design and intent to bring restoration to both the wrong-doer, the recipients of their wrong and the community as a whole.

The mutuality of the process means that, unlike the systems of justice we see in the world, we do not isolate the wrong doer from either the process of correction or as a means of punishment (except as last resort). While we rightly seek to protect the victims, the pattern of reconciliation manifested in Christ’s death and resurrection calls for the radical participation of everyone in the healing process.  This must be done with great care, compassion and wisdom.  This is a guiding understanding, not a rule.  There are certainly exceptions to how it is exercised.  However, when it possible, the humility and grace displayed in the context of community stands as a powerful beckon of hope to a watching world.  This is, in part, what makes Alcoholics Anonymous so widely respected.

However, even more fundamental in this text is the presupposed politic of the people of God.  When the intervention of others was necessary in the process of restorative correction, Jesus taught to widen the circle to include others in the community, then further to include the whole community.  While we will get into the pragmatics of how this works, we must not miss the implications: no hierarchy or formal leadership was pursued in this process of discipline.  Or rather, the authority that it was brought to was the authority Christ intended, the discerning community.

At Little Flowers Community, we seek to make decision together as a community.  For us, this often means resisting two impulses.  On the one side, we resist the urge to expediate these processes through either retreating into democracy, instead working through the difficult process of consensus through discernment.  On the other, we resist the urge to relegate our responsibility by leaving it in the hands of a hierarchical authority structure.  This does not mean that there are not leaders.  We often often submit (through discernment) to the authority of those whose gifting best equips them to help us navigate a given situation.  Their authority is never absolute and it is not positional.  Therefore, my role as pastor in the community gives me more authority only insofar as my gifting is being expressed within the context of the larger community of differently gifted, yet equal leaders.

Further, the level of trust and commitment in our church means that many of us also submit to the wisdom of the discerning community even when making important personal decisions.  We recognize that the mutuality discussed above extends to the whole of our lives.  This flies in the face of the individualism and “rights” mentalities of our culture (which we wrestle with as much as anyone else), but has also produced a way of sharing life together- in essence, living Christ together in the fullness of who we are.

How is church discipline handled in your church community?  Is it primarily punitive or restorative?

How does your community make decisions

UPDATE: Here are a couple of quotes by Yoder that I think flesh this out a bit more:

“There is no distinction between major offenses and minor ones: Any offense is forgivable, but none is trivial”

While this might sound obvious, the fact is that we often screen out issues of reconciliation through a grid in which we dismiss smaller issues as unimportant.  However, in the guise of being quietly forgiving, we are simply avoiding the discomfort of participating in the mundane work of redemption.

“The intention is not to protect the church’s reputation or to teach onlookers the seriousness of sin, but only to serve the offender’s own well-being by restoring her or him to the community.”

These are all too often the primary motivations for church discipline.  The inverse of the above quote is that, towards the end of the offenders restoration, the community must be willing to sully it’s perceived reputation and to suffer the misunderstanding and indignation of the “older brother” Christians within the community.

Tags: Community, discernment, discipline
Posted in Community, Leadership, church | 2 Comments »

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »
  • The cost of being a whole person: http://t.co/DjQcuqb6 #quote #books #christianity # 2012/05/19
    Follow Me

  • You are currently browsing the Jamie Arpin-Ricci – Blog blog archives for December, 2011 .

    • Adoption (15)
    • Advent (5)
    • Anabaptism (31)
    • Bible (38)
    • Books (76)
    • church (62)
    • Church Planting (34)
    • Community (170)
    • Discipleship (36)
    • Easter (1)
    • emerging church (4)
    • Evangelism (19)
    • Film (12)
    • Gospel (57)
    • Jesus (43)
    • Justice (84)
    • Leadership (27)
    • Missional (277)
    • Money (8)
    • Pastors (13)
    • Peace (17)
    • Personal (15)
    • prayer (10)
    • Preaching (1)
    • Sexuality (7)
    • St. Francis (37)
    • Third Place (6)
    • Uncategorized (247)
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
    • 2008
    • 2007

Jamie Arpin-Ricci – Blog is proudly powered by WordPress
Site Design by SoloDesign.ca
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).