• home
  • about
  • books
  • links

Archive for May, 2010

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

Chris Heuertz on Friendship On The Margins

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

Previous Post – Book of James – Part 3

A couple of months ago, I posted my enthusiastic endorsement of Chris Heuertz & Christine Pohl’s new book “Friendship at the Margins: Discovering Mutuality in Service and Mission”.  As promised here is my interview with Chris about the book.  The interview, like the book, is very much worth you time to read and consider.  Enjoy!

Jamie Arpin-Ricci: In a time when “friend” has become a casual verb in social media, what does friendship mean to you?

Chris Heuertz: Friendship is far from an externalized abstraction or a digitalized, virtual connection.  For me, friendship is an honest, confessional, intimate place where people are free to be the best and worst of themselves. Friendship happens when we lower the walls that divide us from people, allowing ourselves and the other to live into a realized transparency and vulnerability. Not all friendships have to be deep, some can simply be playful. I think friendship is best expressed when incubated in the embrace of community, a collective of friends who are connected, committed and find common ground. Communities of friends are most authentic when they are open, hospitable, welcoming, accommodating and inclusive because at its core, true community is grounded and confident-not challenged by the so-called outsider. Communities that are accepting in their embrace allow friends to grieve and celebrate together by living in the liminal space of the ordinary.

JAR: Why was it important for you to co-write this book with Christine Pohl?

CH: More than important, it was necessary to write a book on friendship with Christine. For years I admired her work, but when we first made a personal connection her warmth closed the distance and created a safe space for us to learn together and from one another. I also think it would have been disingenuous to write a book on friendship with someone who I didn’t know. Finally, the book is part of Duke Divinity School’s Centre for Reconciliation’s small book series, Resources for Reconciliation. The first 3 titles in the series are amazing and the next couple look to be pretty fantastic too, but of those 5 books (all co-written by an activist/practitioner alongside a theological/academic) there are no women represented; for me, it was an issue of integrity that a series of books on reconciliation include, celebrate and promote the voices of women and men reflecting together.

JAR: With increased popularity in issues of justice, is there a risk of well-intentioned people mistreating those on the margins?  What do you want people to understand in this respect?

CH: I think one of the greatest laments of mission is a theological reductionism that over-identifies people as potential converts rather than affirms the divine imprint of God in all humanity-a divine imprint that necessitates love.  I think many evangelicals have perfected this form of theological reductionism, failing to love for the sake of love. We’ve turned people into a “target-audience,” mere consumers of our version of a Christian tradition. I think it’s an earnest and sincere mistake, but one that has contributed to the diminishment of all of us in community. Reflecting on the relationship between Jesus and Judas helps us unravel some of these tendencies, Jesus’ “success” with Judas wasn’t demonstrated in Judas’ response to Christ’s love, but was validated in the fidelity of love Christ had for Judas.

JAR: How would you respond those who might say, “All this is good for people like you, living in such unique circumstances.  What does mean for the average joe Christian?”?

CH: I think we can all do a better job reflecting on how we love, who we love and what “strings” to that love need to be removed. Regardless of context we’re all expected to live authentic lives that bear witness to hope and are compelled by love.

JAR: Tell me about writers/books that have formative for you on this topic.

CH: I don’t know that there are authors or books who have been formative for me re: these things, I think it’s my actual friendships with people who are poor or Hindu or Muslim or gay or lesbian or whoever the so-called “other” used to be in my social imagination. Their love for me, welcome and embrace of me and their friendships have really dismantled the donor-receptor roles in how I was raised to believe I am and have to be the catalyst for their conversion. In these kinds of friendships I’ve found myself converted in more ways than one and ultimately I’m the one following them to God’s heart.

JAR: Are you working on any new books?  Can you tell us about it?

CH: I am starting to carve out some time and space to begin working on a project, hopefully starting this fall, on “re-Membering Community.” A book that would name the members of community who have been excluded or left on the margins. It would redefine the margins not as a location, but an orientation and reflect on elements of community that grounds itself with theological commitments and values embodied and demonstrated in ecumenicism, gender equality, multiculturalism and solidarity with those who are poor.

JAR: Tell us something unusual/unique about yourself we might otherwise never know.

CH: Unusual? Hmmmmm… Well, actually most of my friends who are students of activism find one of my hobbies an anomaly. One of my life goals is to see ever every Division 1-A college football team play. I’ve seen 54 of the 120 at 28 different stadiums, that includes seeing every ACC team, and most of the PAC-10, SEC, Big East and Big XII. That’s all I got.

JAR: Thanks Chris.

Tags: Justice, Missional, poverty
Posted in Books, Community, Justice, Missional | 5 Comments »

The Book of James – Part 3

Sunday, May 9th, 2010

Previous Post – The Rule of We

“My brothers, as believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ, don’t show favoritism.  Suppose a man comes into your meeting wearing a gold ring and fine clothes, and a poor man in shabby clothes also comes in. If you show special attention to the man wearing fine clothes and say, “Here’s a good seat for you,” but say to the poor man, “You stand there” or “Sit on the floor by my feet,” have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?”

With this admonition, it becomes clear that James’ concern over treatment of the poor and rich in the church is not a passing issue.  While it can be argued that he was addressing a specific, contextual concern, that the letter is addressed so widely suggests that the writer is confronting a more universal problem facing the all Christian communities.  Is it any surprise that the Book of James has caused such controversy in Church history?

In the NASV, the first line of this section is translated as: “My brethren, do not hold your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with an attitude of personal favoritism.” It is clear from this that favouring some people in the church according to their financial and/or social capital is not only wrong, but contrary to our submission to the Lordship of Christ.  At stake in this is our very role as disciples.  The word “discriminated” is the same word used in James 1:6, there translated as “doubt”.  This suggests that when we discriminate according wealth in the church, we are choosing to evaluate or question, rather than obey, God’s will.  It is for God alone to judge, and in His eyes, we are all equal (both created in His image & fallen short of His glory through sin).  Faith in our “glorious” Lord is such that we His is the only glory worth favouring.

“Listen, my dear brothers: Has not God chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him? But you have insulted the poor. Is it not the rich who are exploiting you? Are they not the ones who are dragging you into court? Are they not the ones who are slandering the noble name of him to whom you belong?  If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, “Love your neighbour as yourself,” you are doing right. But if you show favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers. For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it. For he who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” If you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you have become a lawbreaker.”

Here we are clearly reminded of the Lucan Beatitude, “Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God”.  Together, we can clearly see that Matthews “poor in spirit” was not completely unrelated to material poverty.  While God does not wish poverty on anyone, He knows that in it that pretense is lost, exposing our absolute dependency- a dependency hidden by the shallow security and power of material wealth.

James is not suggesting that all rich people are somehow bad (as almost all of us in Western Christianity qualify as rich), but rather that, more often than not, those of us with privilege and power are too easily drawn into lifestyles of injustice, sometimes explicitly, but all too often in subtle, but devastating ways.  Rather, he is reminding us that true freedom, true obedience is through relinquishing all of our selves to God.  It is this commitment, demonstrated in this very clear example, that embodies Jesus call to “love your neighbour as yourself”.

Again, it might be quite easy for us to make light of such favourtism.  No example of this was more clear to me than at the funeral of Mother Teresa, where dignitaries and world leaders were given prime seating while the poor, while present, remained in more manageable areas.  All kinds of good reasons could be given for these decisions, but I believe they were contrary to Christ’s teachings and Mother Teresa’s will.  It is all too easy for us to make similar expressions of favourtism.  Do you rewards those who give more to the church or ministry?  Are you more likely to reorganized to accommodate  the needs of the “haves”?  Does your faith community even have representation of a truly diverse socio-economic group?  These failings breech God’s intention, no less sin than murder and adultery.

“Speak and act as those who are going to be judged by the law that gives freedom, because judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful. Mercy triumphs over judgment!”

Again, it is not for us to judge.  It is God who will judge us all and, thankfully, it is mercy and grace that will triumph in our judgment, for we all would otherwise perish.  How then can we judge the value of others in the community?  We must radically embrace the equalizing grace and love of Jesus Christ.  To do so is to actively celebrate and incarnate the truth of God’s saving grace for all creation.

Posted in Bible, Community, Justice, Missional | 1 Comment »

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »
  • It's fascinating how ones view of the sovereignty of God shapes ones understanding or & expectations for human political systems. # 1 hour ago
    Follow Me

  • You are currently browsing the Jamie Arpin-Ricci – Blog blog archives for May, 2010 .

    • Adoption (13)
    • Advent (5)
    • Anabaptism (24)
    • Bible (35)
    • Books (72)
    • church (56)
    • Church Planting (34)
    • Community (151)
    • Discipleship (31)
    • Easter (1)
    • emerging church (4)
    • Evangelism (18)
    • Film (9)
    • Gospel (51)
    • Jesus (37)
    • Justice (75)
    • Leadership (24)
    • Missional (254)
    • Money (6)
    • Pastors (10)
    • Peace (17)
    • Personal (13)
    • prayer (7)
    • Sexuality (5)
    • St. Francis (36)
    • Third Place (6)
    • Uncategorized (245)
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
    • 2008
    • 2007

Jamie Arpin-Ricci – Blog is proudly powered by WordPress
Site Design by SoloDesign.ca
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).