• home
  • about
  • books
  • links

The Prodigal’s Home & The Attractional Church

MonFeb 8

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments »

Previous Post – Judging Others – SOTM Series (12)

One of the central themes to the missional movement has been the call to return to an incarnational understanding of ecclesiology and missiology.  As Christ’s Body, the Church is called as one to embody the truth, hope and love of the Gospel in all we are and do, in addition to what we proclaim.  Like Jesus, we are then called to go into the world and actively pursue the lost.  In this sense, as all Christians are part of His Body, all Christians must be by nature missional- that is, shaped and moved by our shared vocation to establish God’s Kingdom through the message and saving work of Jesus Christ.

When incarnational ministry is discussed, it is often discussed in contrast to the attractional ministry model that has so deeply shaped the evangelicalism that we see around us today.  In brief, the attractional approach to ministry seeks to draw people into our churches through attractive and relevant programing, services and opportunities.  The means by which they seek to attract people varies greatly, both in style and intention.  For the sake of this article, I am going assume that most attractional churches seek to offer what they see as healthy, God-oriented programs, services, etc.- that is, despite how it plays out (for better and for worse), let us assume the best of intentions from the attractional church.

Now, it should be said from the beginning that missional-incarnational is not at complete odds with the attractional.  They are not mutually exclusive or completely incompatible.  Rather, it is about priority and emphasis.  I am deeply convinced that missional-incarnational should lay the foundation, working as the primary (though not exclusive) organizing function of the church.  Within that, there is a place for attractional ministry, as long as it is subject to the missional-incarnation emphasis.  Or as I once heard Ed Stetzer put it, the church should not be attractional, but it certainly can be attractive!

Recently, as I was considering this dynamic, I found my mind drawn back to the story of the prodigal son.  After squandering his inheritance, the destitute son decides to return home to his father, for even life as a servant in his family home would be better than the empty life he was living.  And so, he begins the journey home.  When he still a ways off, his father sees him coming, runs to meet him and brings him the rest of the way home, kissing and embracing him with love and compassion.  And then they celebrate his return with a great feast.

This parable, like the two prior to it, is (in part) a story about repentance, recovery and restoration.  What struck me as so beautiful about this story was that, when life turned sour for the prodigal, he knew the nature of his father’s home- that is would be a place of security and forgiveness, even if it meant humbling himself to the lowest position as servant.  His father’s heart was known to him, even in the face of his selfish and reckless behaviour towards him.  His confidence that his welcome, in one form or another, was sure, inspired him to make the journey home.

Are the communities of faith that we build such homes?  Do we represent the Father’s heart in such a way that, even in the face of rejection and exploitation, the prodigal would know that our churches would welcome them?  Sadly, most people would characterize the church as a place where just the opposite is likely to occur.  And yet, it is this kind of attractional nature that we must desperately seek to embody as His people.  This is what we should endeavour to become so that people will be drawn to Christ and His Church.  This is attractional ministry at it’s truest.

And like the father in this tale, we must also go out into the world and meet people even before they have “made it home”.  We need to learn to see with new eyes, recognizing when people are in the process of returning to the Father, even before it happens explicitly.  We are to meet them with joy and love, not judgment and harsh requirements.  Without question, once the son was home and the celebration was complete, his duty to the father would have been clear and uncompromising.  However, it the process of returning, the emphasis was on embrace.

Like the elder son in this parable, we can expect that we will resist this approach as though it were unjust and compromising.  After all, they are sinners and must learn from their mistakes, not be celebrated for them!  And yet we must hear our Father’s words when He says: “My son, celebrate and be glad, because this brother of yours was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found!” After all, we are all returned prodigals.

This vision of a missional-incarnational community is one I can believe in.  Not only does it call us to embody the richness of who Christ is and what He has called us to be, but it also requires us to become together a community of welcome that would inspire the lost to begin their journey home, a journey on which we would join them with love, grace and patience until they are ready to enter into the embrace of the Father and receive their full inheritance.

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments »

Judging Others – SOTM Series (12)

SunFeb 7

Tags: judgment, Missional, sermon on the mount
Posted in Community, Evangelism, Justice, Missional, church | 1 Comment »

Previous Post – Understanding the Liturgical Tradition

Part 1 – Setting the Stage

Part 2 – Beatitudes (1)

Part 3 – Beatitudes (2)

Part 4 – Salt & Light/Law

Part 5 – Murder/Adultery/Divorce

Part 6 – Oaths, Eyes & Enemies

Part 7 – Hiding In Plain Sight

Part 8 – The Lord’s Prayer (1)

Part 9 – The Lord’s Prayer (2)

Part 10 – Fasting

Part 11 – Don’t Worry, Be Righteous

Having blogged for several years around topics of faith and theology, there is a phenomenon that occurs quite regularly that at the same time saddens me and amuses me.  Someone posts a particularly harsh critique of another person (or groups) theology.  That person/group respond by challenging them not to judge (sometimes quoting today’s text).  The critic responds that, when the critiqued tell them (the critic) that they are judging, by in turn are doing the judging.  The endless argument ensues about who is actually judging and who is actually “speaking truth in love”.  Usually neither party is doing the latter, but it still illustrates the often sticky reality of this portion of Jesus teaching.

“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.  Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.” (Matthew 7:1-5)

As we have seen in the previous two chapters of the Sermon (Matthew 5 & 6), the righteousness Jesus is describing is His righteousness.  There is no merit in our own righteousness beyond that which is the reflected righteousness of Christ.  And we can only reflect that insofar as we are in loving and obedient relationship to Him.  Therefore, if the righteousness is not ours to boast, then who are we to judge others?  Why do we continually do so anyway?

There are many motivations that inspire us to judge.  Some do so in an attempt to boost their own moral position, to distract from our own failure to live up to the expectations of Christ, and to undermine someone we have identified as a threat, an enemy or a proponent of “bad theology”.  Some motivations are not so negative.  Some judge to root our legitimate sin, to expose corruption or to correct blatant moral and/or doctrinal failing.  Surely these issues need to be addressed?  Jesus is not suggesting that the legitimate concerns need be ignored.  Far from it!  Rather, He reminding us that, if we believe ourselves worthy of the role of judge, we are blinded to the reality of our own sin, brokenness and equal need of forgiveness.

Stanley Hauerwas writes:

“The disciples are not to judge because any judgment that needs to be made has been made.  For those who follow Jesus as if they can, on their own, determine what is good and what is evil is to betray the work of Christ.  Therefore, the appropriate stance for the acknowledgement of evil is the confession of sin.  We quite literally cannot see clearly unless we have been trained to see ‘the log that is in [our] eye’.  But it is not possible for us to see what in our eye because the eye cannot see itself.  That is why we are able to see ourselves only through the vision made possible by Jesus- a vision made possible by our participation in a community of forgiveness that allows us to name our sins”

Just prior to this portion of the teaching, Jesus said: “”The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eyes are good, your whole body will be full of light. But if your eyes are bad, your whole body will be full of darkness”.  Just as the single-minded devotion to Christ and His Kingdom is compromised by anxiety and attention on material wealth and stability, so to is it compromised when we seek to become the “morality police” for everyone else.  Why?  Because His Kingdom and His righteousness are defined quite clearly- to love God and love others.  Judging is left to the only one more qualified, the God of infinite grace and mercy.

Again, Jesus is not suggesting that we turn a blind eye towards sin.  Too many of us use this Scripture to avoid or reject necessary correction from the community of faith.  Rather it is the heart and the context of that correction that distinguishes it from judgment.  First, repeated the ever present theme of the Sermon, Jesus is pointing to the motivation of the heart.  We are not to judge out of anger, self-righteousness or impatience, but to correct with love, grace and patience.  Second, as Hauerwas makes clear, this correction is an expression of love born out of a genuine community of faith, where relationship with God and each other is our foundation.

Like the blog wars mentioned above, when we allow ourselves to be drawn into the endless cycle of judgment, we are ultimately treated the same way as we treat others.  The standard by which we treat others is the standard by which we will be judged.  The ramifications of this truth are staggering.

“Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and then turn and tear you to pieces.” (Matthew 7:6)

Perhaps it is through over-familiarity with Scripture, but most people hardly pause at these words of Jesus.  And yet, when you consider them, they are incredibly harsh.  The loving Jesus of grace and mercy are referring to people as dogs and pigs?  What could He mean by this?

Jesus knew that, rather than judging people, we were to extend to them what we ourselves received.  That is, the undeserved grace of the Gospel, both actively proclaimed and demonstrated by His people to a watching world.  He also knew, however, that the fact that we do not judge (and instead love) was no guarantee that we would be well received.  Even in the face of generosity, hospitality, love, peace and grace, some will reject us, even scorn us and cast us out.  How then are we to respond?

Again, the temptation to judge would be most present (and seemingly, most justified).  Jesus makes it clear that we are not to do so, but rather to move on (Matt. 10:15).  However, when we see this verse in the context of the wider teaching on judgment, we realize that He is not calling these Gospel-resistant people dogs and swine. which would be a very harsh judgment in itself.  Rather, He is confronting us (again) with our own self-righteousness.  It is we who make the Gospel worthy only of dogs and pigs in our refusal to “shake the dust from our feet” and move on.

The very difficult tension between judgment and loving correction is not easy to navigate.  The complexity of correction and discipline in the church is very, very difficult.  Jesus is not laying out a comprehensive teaching on these topics in this passage, but rather reminding us that, in all things, we must serve in full humility and grace.  These must be the guiding lights when engaging these more complex issues.

Tags: judgment, Missional, sermon on the mount
Posted in Community, Evangelism, Justice, Missional, church | 1 Comment »

« Older Entries
  • Line from Heroes: "Where's the backstage area?" Clare points to stage and says, "Back there". Seriously? That's what passes for writing? # 23 mins ago
    Follow Me

    • Adoption (4)
    • Advent (1)
    • Books (24)
    • church (7)
    • Church Planting (21)
    • Community (53)
    • emerging church (1)
    • Evangelism (6)
    • Film (7)
    • Justice (35)
    • Missional (80)
    • Money (5)
    • Pastors (2)
    • Peace (13)
    • Personal (3)
    • St. Francis (16)
    • Third Place (6)
    • Uncategorized (240)
    • 2010
    • 2009
    • 2008
    • 2007
    • Achievable Ends
    • Alan Hirsch
    • Andrew Jones
    • Andrew Jones
    • Blind Beggar
    • Brenden Mendicant
    • Calacirian
    • Christine Scheller
    • Christine Sine
    • Cindy Bryan
    • Darryl Dash
    • David Fisher
    • David Fitch
    • Deep Church
    • Don Crawford
    • Eliacín
    • Erika Haub
    • Fourth Space
    • Frank E.
    • In A Mirror Darkly
    • John Smulo
    • Jon Reid
    • Jordon Cooper
    • JR Woodward
    • Kim Arpin-Ricci
    • Kingdom Grace
    • Lady Grey
    • Leighton Tebay
    • Linea Lanoie
    • Lyn’s Blog
    • Makeesha
    • Mark Van Steenwyk
    • Mary
    • Matt Brough
    • Matt Stone
    • Mike Farley
    • Missional Outreach Network
    • My old (e)V blog
    • My old Missional blog
    • Nathan Colquhoun
    • Next Reformation
    • Paul Dixon
    • Resonate
    • RobbyMac
    • Scot McKnight
    • Subversive Influence
    • TheyCallMePastorBryan

    The Common Root Friend of Missional Friend of Emergent Village Missional Tribe Rainy River Emall

A Living Alternative Our Missional Pilgrimage is proudly powered by WordPress
Site Design by SoloDesign.ca
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).